Commonwealth v. Bell

102 Mass. 163
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1869
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 102 Mass. 163 (Commonwealth v. Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Bell, 102 Mass. 163 (Mass. 1869).

Opinion

Colt, J.

The instructions given by the learned judge were entirely accurate, and, upon the evidence reported, (which may not have been all that was before the jury,) were warranted by the facts, and all that the case required. No request was made that the jury should be instructed that the evidence was not sufficient to warrant a conviction. The weight of the evidence, from all the circumstances, was for the jury. If they erred in their verdict, (and there is nothing in the case to show that they lid,) the mistake cannot be corrected on this bill of exceptions.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex parte La Page
216 F. 256 (N.D. New York, 1914)
Commonwealth v. Taylor
97 N.E. 94 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1912)
State v. Humason
32 P. 111 (Washington Supreme Court, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 Mass. 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-bell-mass-1869.