Commonwealth v. Begun
This text of 102 N.E.3d 1030 (Commonwealth v. Begun) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Appeals Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
After a trial, a jury convicted the defendant of violating G. L. c. 267, § 1,2 for submitting a falsified bill of sale to his employer, the town of Shirley, for reimbursement. On appeal, both the defendant and the Commonwealth agree that count 1 of the complaint was defective for failing to allege sufficient facts that would constitute a violation of G. L. c. 267, § 1. To sustain a conviction under G. L. c. 267, § 1, the Commonwealth must prove that the defendant "with intent to injure or defraud, falsely ma[de], alter[ed], forge[d] or counterfeit[ed]" one of the instruments enumerated therein. Commonwealth v. Levin,
The judgment is vacated, the verdict is set aside, and the matter is dismissed.
So ordered.
Vacated; set aside; dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
102 N.E.3d 1030, 92 Mass. App. Ct. 1125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-begun-massappct-2018.