Commonwealth v. Batts

981 A.2d 1283, 603 Pa. 65
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 17, 2009·No. 318 MAL 2009·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 17th day of September 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue[s] set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:

(1) Is sentencing a 14-year-old offender to die in prison unconstitutional in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551, 125 S.Ct. 1183, 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005)?
(2) Does the mandatory nature of the sentence in this case violate [petitioner’s] rights under the 8th and 14th Amendments to the United States Constitution?

This Limited Grant is also RESERVED pending disposition of Graham v. Florida and Sullivan v. Florida, — U.S. —, 129 S.Ct. 2157, 173 L.Ed.2d 1155 (2009).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Batts, 981 A.2d 1283, 603 Pa. 65 (Pa. 2009).

981 A.2d 1283 (Commonwealth v. Batts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Com. v. Knecht, M.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2017
Commonwealth v. Batts
66 A.3d 286 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2013)
Commonwealth v. Knox
50 A.3d 732 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2012)
Commonwealth v. Chambers
35 A.3d 34 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)
Commonwealth v. Ortiz
17 A.3d 417 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)