Commonwealth v. Basendorf
25 A. 779, 153 Pa. 459, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1129
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 3, 1893
DocketAppeal, No. 87
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases
This text of 25 A. 779 (Commonwealth v. Basendorf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Basendorf, 25 A. 779, 153 Pa. 459, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1129 (Pa. 1893).
Opinion
We think the court below was right in entering judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defence. The magistrate had the right to take the recognizance, and the short entry of “ Recognizance forfeited, May 5, 1891,” is conclusive in this case that the defendant and the bail were called and did not appear.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Commonwealth v. Miller
150 A.2d 585 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1959)
Commonwealth v. Jakub
128 A.2d 98 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1956)
Commonwealth v. Richardson
100 A.2d 155 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1953)
Commonwealth v. Gardner
82 Pa. D. & C. 353 (Beaver County Court of Common Pleas, 1952)
National Surety Co. v. United States
29 F.2d 92 (Ninth Circuit, 1928)
Commonwealth v. Harvey
70 A. 1093 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1908)
Commonwealth v. Harvey
36 Pa. Super. 235 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1908)
Commonwealth v. Lamar
32 Pa. Super. 200 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1906)
Commonwealth v. Meeser
19 Pa. Super. 1 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1902)
Commonwealth v. Fogelman
3 Pa. Super. 566 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1897)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
25 A. 779, 153 Pa. 459, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-basendorf-pa-1893.