Commonwealth v. Barry

124 Mass. 325, 1878 Mass. LEXIS 310
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedApril 1, 1878
StatusPublished
Cited by42 cases

This text of 124 Mass. 325 (Commonwealth v. Barry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Barry, 124 Mass. 325, 1878 Mass. LEXIS 310 (Mass. 1878).

Opinion

Lord, J.

The principles upon which the decision of this case rests are too well settled and too familiar to justify a citation of authorities.

[327]*327If a person honestly receives the possession of the goods, chattels or money of another upon any trust, express or implied, and, after receiving them, fraudulently converts them to his own use, he may be guilty of the crime of embezzlement, but cannot be of that of larceny, except as embezzlement is by statute made larceny. If the possession of such property is obtained by fraud, and the owner of it intends to part with his title as well as his possession, the offence is that of obtaining property by false pretences, provided the means by which they are acquired are such as, in law, are false pretences. If the possession is fraudulently obtained, with intent on the part of the person obtaining it, at the time he receives it, to convert the same to his own use, and the person parting with it intends to part with his possession merely, and not with • his title to the property, the offence is larceny.

Upon the facts of this case, the jury might well find that the property was obtained by the defendant as stated in the last of these propositions; and the defendant has no cause to complain of the refusal to rule as requested, or of the instructions given.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Richard Carl Bohling v. State
2017 WY 7 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 2017)
Commonwealth v. Mills
764 N.E.2d 854 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2002)
Commonwealth v. Schmukler
494 N.E.2d 48 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1986)
Otte v. State
563 P.2d 1361 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1977)
Jones v. State
322 So. 2d 735 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1975)
Lucas v. State
272 So. 2d 261 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1972)
State v. Jesser
501 P.2d 727 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1972)
First National Bank of Webster v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
256 F. Supp. 266 (D. Massachusetts, 1966)
Hufstetler v. State
63 So. 2d 730 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1953)
Anderson v. State
36 So. 2d 242 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1948)
Jackson v. State
31 So. 2d 514 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1947)
Murchison v. State
26 So. 2d 622 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1946)
Reynolds v. State
15 So. 2d 600 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1943)
Hagan v. State
1943 OK CR 29 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1943)
Commonwealth v. Leland
42 N.E.2d 249 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1942)
State v. Serkau
20 A.2d 725 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1941)
Friedman v. Connors
198 N.E. 513 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1935)
People v. Steurnthal
154 Misc. 130 (New York City Magistrates' Court, 1935)
Commonwealth v. Levine
181 N.E. 851 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1932)
Eiseman & Landsman v. State
12 Ohio Law. Abs. 145 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
124 Mass. 325, 1878 Mass. LEXIS 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-barry-mass-1878.