Commonwealth v. Barr, T.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 28, 2021·No. 583 MAL 2020 (Granted)·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 583 MAL 2020 :

Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : :

TIMOTHY OLIVER BARR II, : :

Petitioner :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of April, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all

remaining issues. The issues, rephrased for clarity, are:

(1) What weight, if any, should the odor of marijuana be given in determining whether probable cause exists for a warrantless vehicle search, in light of the enactment of the Medical Marijuana Act, 35 P.S. § 10231.101 et seq.?

(2) To what extent does this Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. Hicks, 208 A.3d 916 (Pa. 2019), apply to probable cause determinations involving the possession of marijuana following the enactment of the Medical Marijuana Act, 35 P.S. § 10231.101 et seq.?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Barr, T., (Pa. 2021).

Commonwealth v. Barr, T. (Commonwealth v. Barr, T.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Hicks, M., Aplt.
208 A.3d 916 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2019)