Commonwealth v. Barnes, T.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Barnes, T.

99 A.3d 532, 627 Pa. 254, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 2345

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedSeptember 12, 2014

Docket269 MAL 2014 (Granted)

StatusPublished

This text of 99 A.3d 532 (Commonwealth v. Barnes, T.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Barnes, T., 99 A.3d 532, 627 Pa. 254, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 2345 (Pa. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 12th day of September 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Whether the suppression court erred in concluding Respondent was subject to an unlawful search and seizure, thus granting her suppression motion and dismissing all charges based on the erroneous conclusion that the interaction between Trooper Rogowski and Respondent was an investigative detention, requiring reasonable suspicion, as opposed to a mere encounter, requiring no suspicion?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 12th day of September 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Whether the suppression court erred in concluding Respondent was subject to an unlawful search and seizure, thus granting her suppression motion and dismissing all charges based on the erroneous conclusion that the interaction between Trooper Rogowski and Respondent was an investigative detention, requiring reasonable suspicion, as opposed to a mere encounter, requiring no suspicion?

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 A.3d 532, 627 Pa. 254, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 2345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-barnes-t-pa-2014.