Commonwealth v. Barks

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Barks

441 A.2d 1223, 497 Pa. 448, 1982 Pa. LEXIS 402

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 10, 1982

DocketAppeal No. 80-3-485

StatusPublished

This text of 441 A.2d 1223 (Commonwealth v. Barks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Barks, 441 A.2d 1223, 497 Pa. 448, 1982 Pa. LEXIS 402 (Pa. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Justice.

Samuel Barks brings this appeal from judgments of sentence imposed after his conviction in a jury trial of voluntary manslaughter and possessing instruments of crime. Appellant argues he is entitled to a new' trial because of the admission of certain “hearsay” testimony and statements of [449]*449the prosecutor during his closing argument. We have thoroughly reviewed the briefs and the record and find appellant’s arguments are without merit. Therefore, judgment of sentence is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Justice.

Samuel Barks brings this appeal from judgments of sentence imposed after his conviction in a jury trial of voluntary manslaughter and possessing instruments of crime. Appellant argues he is entitled to a new' trial because of the admission of certain “hearsay” testimony and statements of [449]*449the prosecutor during his closing argument. We have thoroughly reviewed the briefs and the record and find appellant’s arguments are without merit. Therefore, judgment of sentence is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

441 A.2d 1223, 497 Pa. 448, 1982 Pa. LEXIS 402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-barks-pa-1982.