Commonwealth v. Barhight

75 Mass. 113
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 15, 1857·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Shaw, C. J.

The magistrate is required to reduce the complaint to writing, and “ cause the same to be subscribed by the complainant.” Rev. Sts. c. 135, § 2. It is not certain that this complaint was reduced to writing before it was sworn to. It cannot be ascertained that this signature was made for the purpose of authenticating the whole complaint. The cases cited, relating to the attestation of wills and the signing of memoranda under the statute of frauds, do not apply. Such looseness and carelessness in instituting criminal proceedings are not to be encouraged. Judgment arrested.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Barhight, 75 Mass. 113 (Mass. 1857).

75 Mass. 113 (Commonwealth v. Barhight) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Griffin
56 Misc. 21 (New York Supreme Court, 1907)