Commonwealth v. Barents

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Commonwealth v. Barents

11 Ky. Op. 353, 3 Ky. L. Rptr. 466, 1881 Ky. LEXIS 326

DecidedDecember 1, 1881

StatusPublished

This text of 11 Ky. Op. 353 (Commonwealth v. Barents) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Barents, 11 Ky. Op. 353, 3 Ky. L. Rptr. 466, 1881 Ky. LEXIS 326 (Ky. Ct. App. 1881).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

The demurrer to the entire proceeding in this case was properly sustained for the reason, if no other, that the forfeiture was had when there was no bond in the circuit court, nor any minutes from [354]*354an examining court filed in the circuit court when the judgment was entered that a bail bond was executed.

P. W. Hardin, S. M. Payton, for appellant. Sandige & Craddock, for appellee.

It was a forfeiture by the court alone. No bond had been executed. Morgan v. Commonwealth, 12 Bush (Ky.) 84.

Judgment affirmed. Judge Lewis not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI