Commonwealth v. Barents

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Commonwealth v. Barents

11 Ky. Op. 353, 3 Ky. L. Rptr. 466, 1881 Ky. LEXIS 326

Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided December 1, 1881·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

The demurrer to the entire proceeding in this case was properly sustained for the reason, if no other, that the forfeiture was had when there was no bond in the circuit court, nor any minutes from [354] an examining court filed in the circuit court when the judgment was entered that a bail bond was executed.

P. W. Hardin, S. M. Payton, for appellant. Sandige & Craddock, for appellee.

It was a forfeiture by the court alone. No bond had been executed. Morgan v. Commonwealth, 12 Bush (Ky.) 84.

Judgment affirmed. Judge Lewis not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

The demurrer to the entire proceeding in this case was properly sustained for the reason, if no other, that the forfeiture was had when there was no bond in the circuit court, nor any minutes from [354] an examining court filed in the circuit court when the judgment was entered that a bail bond was executed.

P. W. Hardin, S. M. Payton, for appellant. Sandige & Craddock, for appellee.

It was a forfeiture by the court alone. No bond had been executed. Morgan v. Commonwealth, 12 Bush (Ky.) 84.

Judgment affirmed. Judge Lewis not sitting.

Commonwealth v. Barents, 11 Ky. Op. 353, 3 Ky. L. Rptr. 466, 1881 Ky. LEXIS 326 (Ky. Ct. App. 1881).

Pincite

11 Ky. Op. 353 (Commonwealth v. Barents) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related