Commonwealth v. Banks

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Banks

211 Pa. Super. 736

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth v. Banks. Read the opinion of the Court — 216 Pa. Super. 405 →

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 8, 1967·No. Appeals, Nos. 297 and 298·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam :

The judgments of sentence are affirmed and the defendants are directed to appear in the court below at such time as they may be there called, and that they be by that court committed until they have complied with the sentences, or any part of them which had not been performed at the time the appeal was made a supersedeas.

Wright, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

The judgments of sentence are affirmed and the defendants are directed to appear in the court below at such time as they may be there called, and that they be by that court committed until they have complied with the sentences, or any part of them which had not been performed at the time the appeal was made a supersedeas.

Wright, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Commonwealth v. Banks, 211 Pa. Super. 736 (Pa. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

211 Pa. Super. 736 (Commonwealth v. Banks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.