Commonwealth v. Balough

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Balough

331 A.2d 511, 231 Pa. Super. 748

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedDecember 12, 1974

DocketAppeal, No. 364

StatusPublished

This text of 331 A.2d 511 (Commonwealth v. Balough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Balough, 331 A.2d 511, 231 Pa. Super. 748 (Pa. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Judgment of sentence on the conviction at indictment No. 1691A below is affirmed.

[749]*749Judgment of sentence on those counts of the indictment at No. 1690A below, charging possession, as distinguished from delivery, of Narcotic Drugs, is excessive. See The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act of 1972, 35 P.S. §§780-101, 113. Commonwealth v. Simpson, 222 Pa. Superior Ct. 296, 294 A. 2d 805 (1972).

Remanded for resentence as to Indictment No. 1690A.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Judgment of sentence on the conviction at indictment No. 1691A below is affirmed.

[749]*749Judgment of sentence on those counts of the indictment at No. 1690A below, charging possession, as distinguished from delivery, of Narcotic Drugs, is excessive. See The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act of 1972, 35 P.S. §§780-101, 113. Commonwealth v. Simpson, 222 Pa. Superior Ct. 296, 294 A. 2d 805 (1972).

Remanded for resentence as to Indictment No. 1690A.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

331 A.2d 511, 231 Pa. Super. 748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-balough-pasuperct-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack