Commonwealth v. Balough

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Balough

331 A.2d 511, 231 Pa. Super. 748

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 12, 1974·No. Appeal, No. 364·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Judgment of sentence on the conviction at indictment No. 1691A below is affirmed.

[749] Judgment of sentence on those counts of the indictment at No. 1690A below, charging possession, as distinguished from delivery, of Narcotic Drugs, is excessive. See The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act of 1972, 35 P.S. §§780-101, 113. Commonwealth v. Simpson, 222 Pa. Superior Ct. 296, 294 A. 2d 805 (1972).

Remanded for resentence as to Indictment No. 1690A.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Judgment of sentence on the conviction at indictment No. 1691A below is affirmed.

[749] Judgment of sentence on those counts of the indictment at No. 1690A below, charging possession, as distinguished from delivery, of Narcotic Drugs, is excessive. See The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act of 1972, 35 P.S. §§780-101, 113. Commonwealth v. Simpson, 222 Pa. Superior Ct. 296, 294 A. 2d 805 (1972).

Remanded for resentence as to Indictment No. 1690A.

Commonwealth v. Balough, 331 A.2d 511, 231 Pa. Super. 748 (Pa. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

331 A.2d 511 (Commonwealth v. Balough) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related