Commonwealth v. Baldwin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Baldwin

957 A.2d 1176

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 25, 2008·No. 229 EAL 2008·Published

Opinion

*1177 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of September 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Should not this Court clarify the doctrine of sentencing merger, and its implications under constitutional double jeopardy analysis, under circumstances where the exact same set of facts satisfies the elements of two different offenses?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*1177 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of September 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Should not this Court clarify the doctrine of sentencing merger, and its implications under constitutional double jeopardy analysis, under circumstances where the exact same set of facts satisfies the elements of two different offenses?

Commonwealth v. Baldwin, 957 A.2d 1176 (Pa. 2008).

Pincite

957 A.2d 1176 (Commonwealth v. Baldwin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.