Commonwealth v. Baldwin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Baldwin

957 A.2d 1176

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedSeptember 25, 2008

Docket229 EAL 2008

StatusPublished

This text of 957 A.2d 1176 (Commonwealth v. Baldwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Baldwin, 957 A.2d 1176 (Pa. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

*1177 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of September 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Should not this Court clarify the doctrine of sentencing merger, and its implications under constitutional double jeopardy analysis, under circumstances where the exact same set of facts satisfies the elements of two different offenses?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*1177 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of September 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Should not this Court clarify the doctrine of sentencing merger, and its implications under constitutional double jeopardy analysis, under circumstances where the exact same set of facts satisfies the elements of two different offenses?

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

957 A.2d 1176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-baldwin-pa-2008.