Commonwealth v. Baker

Supreme Court of Virginia

Commonwealth v. Baker

516 S.E.2d 219, 258 Va. 1, 1999 Va. LEXIS 83

CourtSupreme Court of Virginia

DecidedJune 11, 1999

DocketRecord 982102

StatusPublished

Cited by61 cases

This text of 516 S.E.2d 219 (Commonwealth v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Baker, 516 S.E.2d 219, 258 Va. 1, 1999 Va. LEXIS 83 (Va. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this appeal, the Court reviews a judgment of the Court of Appeals declaring the transfer of jurisdiction from a juvenile and domestic relations district court to a circuit court ineffectual and the subsequent convictions void. Baker v. Commonwealth, 28 Va. App. 306, 504 S.E.2d 394 (1998).

Central to the decision below was the interpretation of Code § 16.1-263(A), which provides, in part, that after a juvenile petition is filed, the court shall direct summonses “to the parents” of the juvenile. Here, even though the juvenile’s mother received notice, the juvenile’s biological father was not notified, there was no attempt to give him notice, and the circuit court made no certification on the record that the identity of the father was not reasonably ascertainable.

Parenthetically, we note the statute has been amended effective July 1, 1999 to provide for notice to “at least one parent.” Acts 1999, ch. 952.

For the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, we will affirm the court’s judgment.

Furthermore, we decline the Attorney General’s request that we apply this judgment prospectively only; retrospective application is mandated by Gogley v. Peyton, 208 Va. 679, 160 S.E.2d 746 (1968).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI