Commonwealth v. Baker-Myers, J.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 26, 2019·No. 193 WAL 2019 (Granted)·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 193 WAL 2019 :

Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. : : :

JAMES DUANE BAKER-MYERS, : :

Respondent :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 26th day of November, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:

(1) Whether the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, citing the case of Commonwealth v. Magliocco, 883 A.2d 479 (Pa. 2005), properly held the language “in violation of Chapter 31” is an essential element necessary for a conviction of Corruption of Minors as a felony of the third degree[.]

(2) Whether the evidence was sufficient for a conviction of Corruption of Minors as a felony of the third degree despite the jury’s acquittal of Rape, Sexual Assault, Aggravated Indecent Assault and Indecent Assault[.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Baker-Myers, J., (Pa. 2019).

Commonwealth v. Baker-Myers, J. (Commonwealth v. Baker-Myers, J.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Magliocco
883 A.2d 479 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2005)