Commonwealth v. Baird

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Baird

932 A.2d 874, 593 Pa. 517, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 1863

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedSeptember 11, 2007

DocketAppeal 161 WAL 2007

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 932 A.2d 874 (Commonwealth v. Baird) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Baird, 932 A.2d 874, 593 Pa. 517, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 1863 (Pa. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 11th day of September, 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

*518 Whether the Superior Court erred in reversing the Trial Court’s Order granting Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 600 where the Defendant did not have actual knowledge of his arraignment, never attempted to hide his whereabouts, and worked with law enforcement during this time.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 11th day of September, 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

*518 Whether the Superior Court erred in reversing the Trial Court’s Order granting Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 600 where the Defendant did not have actual knowledge of his arraignment, never attempted to hide his whereabouts, and worked with law enforcement during this time.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

932 A.2d 874, 593 Pa. 517, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 1863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-baird-pa-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack