Commonwealth v. Baird

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Baird

932 A.2d 874, 593 Pa. 517, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 1863

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 11, 2007·No. Appeal 161 WAL 2007·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 11th day of September, 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

*518 Whether the Superior Court erred in reversing the Trial Court’s Order granting Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 600 where the Defendant did not have actual knowledge of his arraignment, never attempted to hide his whereabouts, and worked with law enforcement during this time.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 11th day of September, 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

*518 Whether the Superior Court erred in reversing the Trial Court’s Order granting Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 600 where the Defendant did not have actual knowledge of his arraignment, never attempted to hide his whereabouts, and worked with law enforcement during this time.

Commonwealth v. Baird, 932 A.2d 874, 593 Pa. 517, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 1863 (Pa. 2007).

Pincite

932 A.2d 874 (Commonwealth v. Baird) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related