Commonwealth v. Ayala

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Ayala

391 A.2d 673, 258 Pa. Super. 583, 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4016

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 12, 1978·No. Appeal, No. 789·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Appellant’s claim that his offenses should have merged is without merit. However, the [584] judgment of sentence is vacated and the case is remanded for resentencing on both the aggravated assault and attempt charges; the new sentence is to be imposed in conformance with 18 Pa. C.S. § 1357.

WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration of decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Appellant’s claim that his offenses should have merged is without merit. However, the [584] judgment of sentence is vacated and the case is remanded for resentencing on both the aggravated assault and attempt charges; the new sentence is to be imposed in conformance with 18 Pa. C.S. § 1357.

WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration of decision of this case.

Commonwealth v. Ayala, 391 A.2d 673, 258 Pa. Super. 583, 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4016 (Pa. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

391 A.2d 673 (Commonwealth v. Ayala) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related