Commonwealth v. Ayala

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Ayala

391 A.2d 673, 258 Pa. Super. 583, 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4016

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 12, 1978

DocketAppeal, No. 789

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 391 A.2d 673 (Commonwealth v. Ayala) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Ayala, 391 A.2d 673, 258 Pa. Super. 583, 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4016 (Pa. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Appellant’s claim that his offenses should have merged is without merit. However, the [584]*584judgment of sentence is vacated and the case is remanded for resentencing on both the aggravated assault and attempt charges; the new sentence is to be imposed in conformance with 18 Pa. C.S. § 1357.

WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration of decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Appellant’s claim that his offenses should have merged is without merit. However, the [584]*584judgment of sentence is vacated and the case is remanded for resentencing on both the aggravated assault and attempt charges; the new sentence is to be imposed in conformance with 18 Pa. C.S. § 1357.

WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration of decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

391 A.2d 673, 258 Pa. Super. 583, 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4016, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-ayala-pasuperct-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack