Commonwealth v. Austin

77 Mass. 330
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 15, 1858·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Thomas, J.

It was one of the conditions of the defendant’s recognizance, not only to appear in this court to prosecute his exceptions, but to abide the decree and order of the court thereon. By the decree and order of this court the exceptions were overruled, and the cause remitted to the court of common pleas for further action. To have abided the order of this court in his cause, the defendant must have appeared at the court to which his cause was remitted and awaited its action. He did not appear and was defaulted. He did not keep his recogni zance and his demurrer must be overruled.

Judgment for the Commonwealth

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Austin, 77 Mass. 330 (Mass. 1858).

77 Mass. 330 (Commonwealth v. Austin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Hazzard
91 N.E. 502 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1910)