Commonwealth v. Austin
This text of 77 Mass. 330 (Commonwealth v. Austin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It was one of the conditions of the defendant’s recognizance, not only to appear in this court to prosecute his exceptions, but to abide the decree and order of the court thereon. By the decree and order of this court the exceptions were overruled, and the cause remitted to the court of common pleas for further action. To have abided the order of this court in his cause, the defendant must have appeared at the court to which his cause was remitted and awaited its action. He did not appear and was defaulted. He did not keep his recogni zance and his demurrer must be overruled.
Judgment for the Commonwealth
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
77 Mass. 330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-austin-mass-1858.