Commonwealth v. Au

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Au

995 A.2d 349, 606 Pa. 113, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1174

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 28, 2010·No. 1005 MAL 2009·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of May, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Does asking the occupants of a parked vehicle for their identification constitute an investigative detention for which reasonable suspicion is required?

Justice ORIE MELVIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of May, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Does asking the occupants of a parked vehicle for their identification constitute an investigative detention for which reasonable suspicion is required?

Justice ORIE MELVIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Commonwealth v. Au, 995 A.2d 349, 606 Pa. 113, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 1174 (Pa. 2010).

Pincite

995 A.2d 349 (Commonwealth v. Au) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related