Commonwealth v. Atkinson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Atkinson

954 A.2d 566

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 11, 2008

Docket1070 MAL 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 954 A.2d 566 (Commonwealth v. Atkinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Atkinson, 954 A.2d 566 (Pa. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 11th day of July 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. This matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court to address the following issue:

Whether the trial court erred in finding that testimony of a prosecution witness and his identification of Petitioner at a suppression hearing via videoconferencing *567 equipment was not prejudicial to Petitioner’s right to confrontation and was thus constitutional?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 11th day of July 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. This matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court to address the following issue:

Whether the trial court erred in finding that testimony of a prosecution witness and his identification of Petitioner at a suppression hearing via videoconferencing *567 equipment was not prejudicial to Petitioner’s right to confrontation and was thus constitutional?

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

954 A.2d 566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-atkinson-pa-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack