Commonwealth v. Athearn
This text of 3 Mass. 285 (Commonwealth v. Athearn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
I should not be for granting an information in any case, where the judgment of the Court upon the information can have no effect. The officer may be liable to a fine, in case judgment of a motion be rendered, but not otherwise, as I now recollect When the information comes to a hearing, this man’s tenure in the office he claims will have expired. We could not then pass a judgment of removal. Upon this ground I am against granting the information.
I consider this rather as a proceeding in rem, to obtain a specific remedy, than as a mode by which the respondent is to be punished. But before judgment can be rendered, the mischief will be gone. To proceed further in the case would be futile;
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Mass. 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-athearn-mass-1807.