Commonwealth v. Athearn

3 Mass. 285
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1807
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 3 Mass. 285 (Commonwealth v. Athearn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Athearn, 3 Mass. 285 (Mass. 1807).

Opinions

Parker, J.

I should not be for granting an information in any case, where the judgment of the Court upon the information can have no effect. The officer may be liable to a fine, in case judgment of a motion be rendered, but not otherwise, as I now recollect When the information comes to a hearing, this man’s tenure in the office he claims will have expired. We could not then pass a judgment of removal. Upon this ground I am against granting the information.

* Sewall, J.

I consider this rather as a proceeding in rem, to obtain a specific remedy, than as a mode by which the respondent is to be punished. But before judgment can be rendered, the mischief will be gone. To proceed further in the case would be futile;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cummings v. Eastman
136 A. 810 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1927)
Gosney v. Butler Graded School
292 S.W. 781 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1927)
Albemarle Oil & Gas Co. v. Morris
121 S.E. 60 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1924)
Attorney General v. City of Methuen
236 Mass. 564 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1921)
Haupt v. Rogers
48 N.E. 1080 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1898)
Attorney General v. Sullivan
28 L.R.A. 455 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1895)
Delgado v. Chavez
5 N.M. 646 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1891)
New England Mutual Life Insurance v. Phillips
6 N.E. 534 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1886)
People ex rel. Dafoe v. Harshaw
26 N.W. 879 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1886)
Attorney-General Ex Rel. Libbey v. Megin
63 N.H. 378 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1885)
Dane v. Derby
54 Me. 95 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1866)
People ex rel. Speed v. Hartwell
12 Mich. 508 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1864)
Goddard v. Smithett
69 Mass. 116 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1854)
State ex rel. Stock v. Schnierle
39 S.C.L. 299 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1852)
Kimball v. Lamprey
19 N.H. 215 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1848)
People ex rel. Attorney General v. Tisdale
1 Doug. 59 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1843)
State ex rel. Hill v. Burnett
2 Ala. 140 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1841)
Inhabitants of the First Parish v. Stearns
38 Mass. 148 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1839)
People v. Richardson
4 Cow. 97 (New York Supreme Court, 1825)
Fish v. Weatherwax
2 Johns. Cas. 215 (New York Supreme Court, 1801)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Mass. 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-athearn-mass-1807.