Commonwealth v. Arter, K.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Arter, K.

120 A.3d 299, 632 Pa. 438, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 1612

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 28, 2015·No. 11 MAL 2015 (Granted)·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of July, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is as follows:

Whether the Superior Court erred in upholding the Revocation Court’s denial of Petitioner’s motion to exclude evidence obtained in violation of the Petitioner’s privacy rights under Article I, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of July, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is as follows:

Whether the Superior Court erred in upholding the Revocation Court’s denial of Petitioner’s motion to exclude evidence obtained in violation of the Petitioner’s privacy rights under Article I, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution?

Commonwealth v. Arter, K., 120 A.3d 299, 632 Pa. 438, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 1612 (Pa. 2015).

Pincite

120 A.3d 299 (Commonwealth v. Arter, K.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related