Commonwealth v. Arnold

21 Mass. 251
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 28, 1826
StatusPublished

This text of 21 Mass. 251 (Commonwealth v. Arnold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Arnold, 21 Mass. 251 (Mass. 1826).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The indictment is good. It states that the defendant was in the actual employment of an innholder.

The statute makes it unlawful to permit playing cc at cards,” and the words (< the game of” maybe struck out as surplusage.1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 Mass. 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-arnold-mass-1826.