Commonwealth v. A.R.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. A.R.

50 A.3d 122, 616 Pa. 469, 2012 WL 3068465, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 1669

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 26, 2012·No. No. 269 MAL 2010·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 26th day of July, 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Did the Superior Court err in affirming the admission of the results of the therapeutic polygraph at the violation of probation hearing? Were the enumerated conditions of admissibility appropriate?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 26th day of July, 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Did the Superior Court err in affirming the admission of the results of the therapeutic polygraph at the violation of probation hearing? Were the enumerated conditions of admissibility appropriate?

Commonwealth v. A.R., 50 A.3d 122, 616 Pa. 469, 2012 WL 3068465, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 1669 (Pa. 2012).

Pincite

50 A.3d 122 (Commonwealth v. A.R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related