Commonwealth v. A.R.

50 A.3d 122, 616 Pa. 469, 2012 WL 3068465, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 1669
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 26, 2012
DocketNo. 269 MAL 2010
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 50 A.3d 122 (Commonwealth v. A.R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. A.R., 50 A.3d 122, 616 Pa. 469, 2012 WL 3068465, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 1669 (Pa. 2012).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 26th day of July, 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Did the Superior Court err in affirming the admission of the results of the therapeutic polygraph at the violation of probation hearing? Were the enumerated conditions of admissibility appropriate?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. A.R.
80 A.3d 1180 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 A.3d 122, 616 Pa. 469, 2012 WL 3068465, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 1669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-ar-pa-2012.