Commonwealth v. Aparicio

440 N.E.2d 778, 14 Mass. App. Ct. 993, 1982 Mass. App. LEXIS 1456
CourtMassachusetts Appeals Court
DecidedOctober 4, 1982
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 440 N.E.2d 778 (Commonwealth v. Aparicio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Appeals Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Aparicio, 440 N.E.2d 778, 14 Mass. App. Ct. 993, 1982 Mass. App. LEXIS 1456 (Mass. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

The defendant contends that the cross-examination of the defendant by the prosecutor was improper and prejudicial. The defendant did not object at trial. After examining the transcript of this cross-examination, we conclude that there was no miscarriage of justice. Commonwealth v. Freeman, 352 Mass. 556, 563-564 (1967).

The judge was correct in denying the defendant’s motion for a required finding of not guilty. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, it was evident that the Commonwealth had satisfied its burden under Commonwealth v. Latimore, 378 Mass. 671, 676-677 (1979).

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Chase
877 N.E.2d 945 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 2007)
Commonwealth v. Gonzalez
863 N.E.2d 958 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 2007)
Commonwealth v. Peixoto
722 N.E.2d 470 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2000)
Commonwealth v. LaPerle
475 N.E.2d 81 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1985)
Commonwealth v. Murray
459 N.E.2d 123 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1984)
Commonwealth v. Buckley
458 N.E.2d 781 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
440 N.E.2d 778, 14 Mass. App. Ct. 993, 1982 Mass. App. LEXIS 1456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-aparicio-massappct-1982.