Commonwealth v. ANTOSZYK
12 A.3d 289, 608 Pa. 425, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 94
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 13, 2011
Docket587 WAL 2009
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 12 A.3d 289 (Commonwealth v. ANTOSZYK) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Commonwealth v. ANTOSZYK, 12 A.3d 289, 608 Pa. 425, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 94 (Pa. 2011).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 13th day of January, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED with respect to the following issue:
Whether, under Pennsylvania law, a search warrant should be invalidated, and the evidence obtained therefrom sup *426 pressed, when the affidavit of probable cause was based upon a deliberate misstatement of material fact by a confidential informant, notwithstanding the good faith of the affiant who reasonably believed the confidential informant was reliable, and whose statements the affiant believed to be true?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILA. v. Johnson
12 A.3d 289 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)
Commonwealth v. Martin
694 A.2d 343 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1997)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
12 A.3d 289, 608 Pa. 425, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-antoszyk-pa-2011.