Commonwealth v. Anthony

102 A. 420, 259 Pa. 65, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 515
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 30, 1917·No. Appeal, No. 123·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

In the performance of the duty imposed upon us by the Act of February 15,1870, P. L. 15, we have reviewed both the law and the evidence in this case, and find that the ingredients necessary to constitute murder of the first degree were proved to exist on the trial of the prisoner. The instructions complained of in the first, second and third assignments are free from error. The latitude asked for by the prisoner’s counsel in the cross-examination of the witness called by the Commonwealth in rebuttal, was properly denied, for the reason given by the learned triai judge. The fifth and last assignment complains only of the judgment, which is now affirmed, with direction that the record be remitted for the purpose of execution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Anthony, 102 A. 420, 259 Pa. 65, 1917 Pa. LEXIS 515 (Pa. 1917).

102 A. 420 (Commonwealth v. Anthony) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Patterson
41 Pa. D. & C. 215 (Erie County Court of Oyer and Terminer, 1941)
Commonwealth v. Blakeley
117 A. 685 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1922)