Commonwealth v. Angle

Luzerne County Court of Quarter Sessions

Commonwealth v. Angle

20 Pa. D. & C. 491, 1934 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 315

CourtLuzerne County Court of Quarter Sessions

DecidedJanuary 27, 1934

Docketno. 180

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 20 Pa. D. & C. 491 (Commonwealth v. Angle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Luzerne County Court of Quarter Sessions primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Angle, 20 Pa. D. & C. 491, 1934 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 315 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Jones, J.,

This is a petition to strike off a bail forfeiture. Defendant was arrested on a charge of fraud and entered bail before the aider-man in the sum of $2,000 for his appearance at the next term of court, the petitioner, James A. McKane, becoming bail. Subsequently, defendant was indicted [492]*492and, after trial, was found guilty of fraudulent conversion, and the court forfeited the bail, to be respited upon the defendant’s appearance the following week.

Defendant appeared, and the court, being informed that defendant had paid $250 on account of the funds converted, directed that the balance of $750 be paid within 12 months in sums of not less than $100 per month, bail to be forfeited and respited when the entire amount was paid.

This is a petition on the part of the bail to strike off the forfeiture, upon the ground that petitioner did not undertake any civil or other liability, except as expressed in his recognizance.

The liability of bail rests upon the terms and conditions of the obligation. In this ease, the recognizance requires that the defendant “shall be and appear at the next court of quarter sessions to be holden in and for said county and not depart the court without leave.” The defendant did appear as required and did not depart until the court permitted him to leave, under certain conditions not required by the recognizance. Defendant was released for 12 months, conditioned upon his paying monthly instalments on account of the money embezzled.

Therefore, the nature and extent of defendant’s recognizance was affected in such a way as to result in an increase of risk and liability upon the bail, who agreed that he would appear at the next court of quarter sessions and not at the end of any stated period, such as 12 months.

The bail; being placed in a situation which materially changes the legal nature of his obligation, is entitled to relief, and therefore the forfeiture of the bail is stricken off and the bail is discharged from any liability thereunder.

From Frank P. Slattery, Wilkes-Barre, Pa.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jones, J.,

This is a petition to strike off a bail forfeiture. Defendant was arrested on a charge of fraud and entered bail before the aider-man in the sum of $2,000 for his appearance at the next term of court, the petitioner, James A. McKane, becoming bail. Subsequently, defendant was indicted [492]*492and, after trial, was found guilty of fraudulent conversion, and the court forfeited the bail, to be respited upon the defendant’s appearance the following week.

Defendant appeared, and the court, being informed that defendant had paid $250 on account of the funds converted, directed that the balance of $750 be paid within 12 months in sums of not less than $100 per month, bail to be forfeited and respited when the entire amount was paid.

This is a petition on the part of the bail to strike off the forfeiture, upon the ground that petitioner did not undertake any civil or other liability, except as expressed in his recognizance.

The liability of bail rests upon the terms and conditions of the obligation. In this ease, the recognizance requires that the defendant “shall be and appear at the next court of quarter sessions to be holden in and for said county and not depart the court without leave.” The defendant did appear as required and did not depart until the court permitted him to leave, under certain conditions not required by the recognizance. Defendant was released for 12 months, conditioned upon his paying monthly instalments on account of the money embezzled.

Therefore, the nature and extent of defendant’s recognizance was affected in such a way as to result in an increase of risk and liability upon the bail, who agreed that he would appear at the next court of quarter sessions and not at the end of any stated period, such as 12 months.

The bail; being placed in a situation which materially changes the legal nature of his obligation, is entitled to relief, and therefore the forfeiture of the bail is stricken off and the bail is discharged from any liability thereunder.

From Frank P. Slattery, Wilkes-Barre, Pa.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 Pa. D. & C. 491, 1934 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-angle-paqtrsessluzern-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack