Commonwealth v. Andoukitis
This text of 83 Pa. Super. 206 (Commonwealth v. Andoukitis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In No. 5 February Term 1924, George Andoukitis— L. Bolevich — Anthony Lewitsky are named as appellants; the same parties are named as appellants in No. 6 February Term, and also in No. 7 February Term. They were summarily convicted of violating the Acts of July 28, 1917, P. L. 1215; July 9, 1919, P. L. 799, and May 16,1921, P. L. 559, each being convicted of violating the acts in three different particulars. We cannot sustain joint appeals: Com. v. Surety Co., 37 Pa. Superior Ct. 167; Idell v. Day, 79 Pa. Superior Ct. 215.
Only part of the record has been printed. Among other matters the exceptions filed in the court below to the proceedings before the alderman are not printed. No question can be considered here on appeal that does not appear to have been raised in the court below.
The assignments of error do not conform to our rules; all but one appear to be directed to the action of the alderman; they have no relation to the record brought to us for review.
No. 5 February Term 1924, appeal quashed.
No. 6 February Term 1924, appeal quashed.
No. 7 February Term 1924, appeal quashed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
83 Pa. Super. 206, 1924 Pa. Super. LEXIS 101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-andoukitis-pasuperct-1924.