Commonwealth v. Amaro

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Amaro

961 A.2d 56

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 25, 2008·No. 168 MAL 2008·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of November 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED and the Superior Court’s decision is VACATED and the PCRA Court’s Order dismissing Petitioner’s PCRA petition is REINSTATED based on Commonwealth v. Jones, 593 Pa. 295, 929 A.2d 205 (2007) and Commonwealth v. Chmiel, 585 Pa. 547, 889 A.2d 501, 541 (2005).

Justice McCAFFERY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of November 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED and the Superior Court’s decision is VACATED and the PCRA Court’s Order dismissing Petitioner’s PCRA petition is REINSTATED based on Commonwealth v. Jones, 593 Pa. 295, 929 A.2d 205 (2007) and Commonwealth v. Chmiel, 585 Pa. 547, 889 A.2d 501, 541 (2005).

Justice McCAFFERY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Commonwealth v. Amaro, 961 A.2d 56 (Pa. 2008).

Pincite

961 A.2d 56 (Commonwealth v. Amaro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related