Commonwealth v. Amaro

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Amaro

961 A.2d 56, 599 Pa. 163, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 2149

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedNovember 25, 2008

DocketAppeal No. 168 MAL 2008

StatusPublished

This text of 961 A.2d 56 (Commonwealth v. Amaro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Amaro, 961 A.2d 56, 599 Pa. 163, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 2149 (Pa. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of November 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED and the Superior Court’s decision is VACATED and the PCRA Court’s Order dismissing Petitioner’s PCRA petition is REINSTATED [164]*164based on Commonwealth v. Jones, 593 Pa. 295, 929 A.2d 205 (2007) and Commonwealth v. Chmiel, 585 Pa. 547, 889 A.2d 501, 541 (2005).

Justice McCAFFERY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of November 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED and the Superior Court’s decision is VACATED and the PCRA Court’s Order dismissing Petitioner’s PCRA petition is REINSTATED [164]*164based on Commonwealth v. Jones, 593 Pa. 295, 929 A.2d 205 (2007) and Commonwealth v. Chmiel, 585 Pa. 547, 889 A.2d 501, 541 (2005).

Justice McCAFFERY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

961 A.2d 56, 599 Pa. 163, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 2149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-amaro-pa-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack