Commonwealth v. Alton
This text of 224 A.2d 792 (Commonwealth v. Alton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion
The record in this case shows that this was an appeal from a summary conviction and that a de novo hearing was held before the court below and that at the conclusion of said hearing the court entered an order that “The appeal is dismissed and the judgment of the magistrate is affirmed.”
It is pointed out in Com. v. Young, 184 Pa. Superior Ct. 658, 135 A. 2d 774, that there should have been a finding that the defendant was guilty or not guilty. We reversed the Young case with a procedendo and we must do the same thing here.
Judgment reversed with a procedendo.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
224 A.2d 792, 209 Pa. Super. 168, 1966 Pa. Super. LEXIS 706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-alton-pasuperct-1966.