Commonwealth v. Allen
This text of 386 A.2d 607 (Commonwealth v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant, Walter Allen, entered guilty pleas without the assistance of counsel to charges of aggravated assault, carrying a firearm without a license and commission of a crime of violence with a firearm. Prior to accepting appellant’s waiver of counsel, the lower court informed appellant of his right to the assistance of counsel, without cost if necessary. While this information may have been sufficient to establish a voluntary waiver, it was insufficient to estab[261]*261lish that the waiver was knowingly and intelligently made. After reviewing the record, we hold that appellant did not knowingly and intelligently waive his right to counsel. Commonwealth v. Grant, 229 Pa.Super. 419, 323 A.2d 354 (1974); Commonwealth v. Morrison, 222 Pa.Super. 304, 294 A.2d 759 (1972). The judgment of sentence is therefore reversed, and the case is remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
386 A.2d 607, 255 Pa. Super. 259, 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-allen-pasuperct-1978.