Commonwealth v. Alicia
44 A.3d 1147, 615 Pa. 613, 2012 WL 1676612, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 1101
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 15, 2012
Docket365 EAL 2011
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 44 A.3d 1147 (Commonwealth v. Alicia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Alicia, 44 A.3d 1147, 615 Pa. 613, 2012 WL 1676612, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 1101 (Pa. 2012).
Opinion
*614 ORDER
AND NOW, this 15th day of May, 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to the remaining issue. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
Under this Court’s precedent, which the Superior Court mischaracterized and misapplied, does expert testimony on “the phenomenon of false confessions” impermissibly invade the jury’s exclusive role as the arbiter of credibility?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Commonwealth v. Alicia
92 A.3d 753 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2014)
Commonwealth v. Harrell
65 A.3d 420 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2013)
Commonwealth v. Koch
44 A.3d 1147 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2012)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
44 A.3d 1147, 615 Pa. 613, 2012 WL 1676612, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 1101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-alicia-pa-2012.