Commonwealth v. Alicea

22 A.3d 1029, 610 Pa. 566, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 1438
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 27, 2011·No. 633 MAL 2010·Published

Opinion

*567 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of June, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, and the decision of the Superior Court is VACATED. The Superior Court erroneously based its holding that the trial court abused its discretion in the admission of evidence on a distinct legal theory that Respondent did not preserve or develop. See Pa.R.A.P. 302(a); Commonwealth v. Fletcher, 604 Pa. 493, 535-36, 986 A.2d 759, 785 (2009). The matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court for consideration and disposition of the issues properly preserved and developed for its review.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Alicea, 22 A.3d 1029, 610 Pa. 566, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 1438 (Pa. 2011).

22 A.3d 1029 (Commonwealth v. Alicea) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Fletcher
986 A.2d 759 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2009)