Commonwealth v. Alderman
4 Mass. 477
Opinion
directed the clerk to enter the plea of guilty alone, observing that it had heretofore been solemnly determined that a conviction of a breach of the peace before a magistrate, on the confession or information of the offender himself, was no bar to an indictment by the grand iury for the same offence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Alderman, 4 Mass. 477 (Mass. 1808).
4 Mass. 477 (Commonwealth v. Alderman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ex Parte Martinez, Jr.
145 S.W. 959 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1912)
Peters v. Koepke
59 N.E. 33 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1901)
DeBord v. People
27 Colo. 377 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1900)
Shideler v. State
16 L.R.A. 225 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1891)
Sanders v. State
85 Ind. 318 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1882)
Watkins v. State
68 Ind. 427 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1879)
Small v. State
63 Ga. 386 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1879)
State v. . Swepson
79 N.C. 632 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1878)
Commonwealth v. Dascom
111 Mass. 404 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1873)
Kohlheimer v. State
2 Morr. St. Cas. 1388 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1872)
State v. Reed
26 Conn. 202 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1857)