Commonwealth v. Aikens, M.

160 A.3d 781, 639 Pa. 371, 2016 WL 6496970, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 2503
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 2, 2016·No. 268 EAL 2016 (Granted)·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of November, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner is:

(1) Did the court illegally sentence [Aikens] on unlawful contact with a minor graded as an F-l when it should have been graded as an F-3?
Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Aikens, M., 160 A.3d 781, 639 Pa. 371, 2016 WL 6496970, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 2503 (Pa. 2016).

160 A.3d 781 (Commonwealth v. Aikens, M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Weimer
167 A.3d 78 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2017)