Commonwealth v. Addison

4 U.S. 225, 1 L. Ed. 810, 4 Dall. 225, 1801 U.S. LEXIS 109
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 1, 1801·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

4 U.S. 225 (____)
4 Dall. 225

Commonwealth
versus
Addison.

Supreme Court of United States.

In support of the motion, the attorney-general.

But, by the COURT:

We are, unanimously, of opinion, that the case does not present to our consideration an indictable offence; and, of course, it is not a case, in which an information ought to be granted. But we are (with the same unanimity) of opinion, that every judge has a right, and, emphatically, that it is his duty, to deliver his sentiments upon every subject that occurs in Court. We add, so far as the expression of our sense of decorum may have weight, that we think, it would be indecent and improper, in any presiding judge, to attempt to prevent his associates from the exercise of this right; from the performance of this duty.

Motion refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Addison, 4 U.S. 225, 1 L. Ed. 810, 4 Dall. 225, 1801 U.S. LEXIS 109 (1801).

4 U.S. 225 (Commonwealth v. Addison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Merriken v. Cressman
364 F. Supp. 913 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1973)
Solomon Feldman, Jr. v. State Board of Law Examiners
438 F.2d 699 (Eighth Circuit, 1971)
United States v. Chaplin
54 F. Supp. 926 (S.D. California, 1944)
Daly v. Mouroe
2 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 160 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1885)