Commonwealth v. Addison

4 U.S. 225, 1 L. Ed. 810, 4 Dall. 225, 1801 U.S. LEXIS 109
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 1, 1801
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 4 U.S. 225 (Commonwealth v. Addison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Addison, 4 U.S. 225, 1 L. Ed. 810, 4 Dall. 225, 1801 U.S. LEXIS 109 (1801).

Opinion

4 U.S. 225 (____)
4 Dall. 225

Commonwealth
versus
Addison.

Supreme Court of United States.

In support of the motion, the attorney-general.

But, by the COURT:

We are, unanimously, of opinion, that the case does not present to our consideration an indictable offence; and, of course, it is not a case, in which an information ought to be granted. But we are (with the same unanimity) of opinion, that every judge has a right, and, emphatically, that it is his duty, to deliver his sentiments upon every subject that occurs in Court. We add, so far as the expression of our sense of decorum may have weight, that we think, it would be indecent and improper, in any presiding judge, to attempt to prevent his associates from the exercise of this right; from the performance of this duty.

Motion refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Merriken v. Cressman
364 F. Supp. 913 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1973)
Solomon Feldman, Jr. v. State Board of Law Examiners
438 F.2d 699 (Eighth Circuit, 1971)
United States v. Chaplin
54 F. Supp. 926 (S.D. California, 1944)
Daly v. Mouroe
2 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 160 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 U.S. 225, 1 L. Ed. 810, 4 Dall. 225, 1801 U.S. LEXIS 109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-addison-scotus-1801.