Commonwealth v. Adams

109 Mass. 344
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1872
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 109 Mass. 344 (Commonwealth v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Adams, 109 Mass. 344 (Mass. 1872).

Opinion

Morton, J.

The statute provides that whoever, without a license from the mayor and aldermen or selectmen, keeps or suffers to be kept in a house, building, yard, or dependency thereof, by him actually occupied or owned, a table for the purpose of playing at billiards for hire, gain or reward, shall be subject to a fine. Gen. Sts. e. 88, § 70. In the case at bar, it was shown at the trial, that the defendant fitted up a room in a building owned by him with three billiard tables, and let the room and the tables to John Shehan for the agreed price of ten dollars per week; and that the tables, "with the knowledge of the defendant, were used for the purpose of playing at billiards for hire, gain or reward, neither the defendant nor Shehan having a license.

It does not appear whether there was any other evidence at the trial; but if there was not, the jury would be justified m finding a verdict of guilty upon the facts stated in the report and inch inferences as may be fair1/ drawn from them. The tables [345]*345belonged to the defendant • and, for aught that appears, the license to Shehan to use them was revocable at any time. The jury might well draw the inference from the evidence before them, that the defendant fitted up his room, and let his tables, with the intent that they should be used for an illegal purpose, he having the power to prevent it. They were therefore justified in finding that he was within the description of the statute, as a person who without any license suffers to be kept in a house owned by him a table for the purpose of playing at billiards for hire, gain or reward. The fact that he receives compensation for such permitted illegal use of his tables, by a fixed weekly sum, is immaterial.

Sentence on the verdict*

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wallace v. Mayor of Reno
73 P. 528 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1903)
Commonwealth v. Kinsley
133 Mass. 578 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1882)
Territory v. Stone
2 Dakota 155 (Supreme Court of Dakota, 1879)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
109 Mass. 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-adams-mass-1872.