Commonwealth v. ACQUAVIVA
145 A.2d 407, 187 Pa. Super. 550, 1958 Pa. Super. LEXIS 710
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 10, 1958·No. Appeals, 188 to 191·Published·Cited by 10 cases
Opinion
Opinion
The judgments of sentence of the court below are affirmed on the opinion of Judge Laub, specially presiding in the Court of Quarter Sessions of Lawrence County, as reported in 14 Pa. D. & C. 2d 285.
It is ordered that defendants appear in the court below at such time as they may be there called, and that they be by that court committed until they have complied with their sentences or any part thereof which had not been performed at the time the appeals were made a supersedeas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. ACQUAVIVA, 145 A.2d 407, 187 Pa. Super. 550, 1958 Pa. Super. LEXIS 710 (Pa. Ct. App. 1958).
145 A.2d 407 (Commonwealth v. ACQUAVIVA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Steven M. Kramer v. Richard Thompson
947 F.2d 666 (Third Circuit, 1991)
Commonwealth v. Ewansik
520 A.2d 1189 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1987)
Robi Enterprises, Ltd. v. Zoning Hearing Board
27 Pa. D. & C.3d 121 (Berks County Court of Common Pleas, 1982)
Commonwealth v. Wadzinski
422 A.2d 124 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1980)
Commonwealth v. Wadzinski
403 A.2d 91 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1979)
Commonwealth v. Dennis
329 N.E.2d 706 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1975)
Pittsburgh Press Employment Advertising Discrimination Appeal
287 A.2d 161 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1972)
Commonwealth v. King
33 Pa. D. & C.2d 235 (Allegheny County Court of Quarter Sessions, 1963)
Commonwealth v. Farace
26 Pa. D. & C.2d 265 (Luzerne County Court of Quarter Sessions, 1961)