Commonwealth v. Ackerman

249 N.E.2d 631, 356 Mass. 721, 1969 Mass. LEXIS 890
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided June 23, 1969·Published

Opinion

A judge of the Superior Court sitting without jury convicted the defendant of rape in a trial subject to G. L. c. 278, §§ 33A-33G. At the trial the defendant was represented by counsel. The reported testimony shows that the charge was convincingly proved in detail. No question worthy of discussion has been .raised. Id this court the defendant, who had discharged his trial counsel, has written the clerk insisting on his right to represent himself and refusing to be represented by a lawyer appointed by the court.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Ackerman, 249 N.E.2d 631, 356 Mass. 721, 1969 Mass. LEXIS 890 (Mass. 1969).

249 N.E.2d 631 (Commonwealth v. Ackerman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 33A-33G
Massachusetts § 33A-33G