Commonwealth v. Acevedo
This text of 917 N.E.2d 191 (Commonwealth v. Acevedo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The relevant facts, drawn from the motion judge’s findings, are set forth in the Appeals Court’s opinion. See id. at 454-455. After careful review of the findings and consideration of the arguments from both sides, we affirm the denial of the motion to suppress, for essentially the same reasons stated by the motion judge in her memorandum of decision and by the Appeals Court in its opinion. In the totality of the circumstances found by the judge, there was reasonable suspicion to justify the stop of the defendant.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
917 N.E.2d 191, 455 Mass. 1013, 2009 Mass. LEXIS 757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-acevedo-mass-2009.