Commonwealth v. Abraham

9 A.3d 1133, 607 Pa. 618, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2713
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 30, 2010·No. 305 WAL 2010·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 30th day of November 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issues, rephrased for clarity, are:

(1) Whether, in light of Padilla v. Kentucky, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), the distinction in Pennsylvania between direct and collateral consequences to define the scope of constitutionally “reasonable professional assistance” required under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984) is appropriate?

*619 (2) If so, whether the forfeiture of a pension that stems from a public school teacher’s negotiated plea to crimes committed in the scope of his employment is a collateral consequence of a criminal conviction which relieves counsel from any affirmative duty to investigate and advise?

Justice ORIE MELVIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Abraham, 9 A.3d 1133, 607 Pa. 618, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2713 (Pa. 2010).

9 A.3d 1133 (Commonwealth v. Abraham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. Allegheny Intermediate Unit
59 A.3d 10 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2012)
Commonwealth v. Abraham
62 A.3d 343 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2012)
Jones v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
492 F. App'x 242 (Third Circuit, 2012)
Commonwealth v. Wah
42 A.3d 335 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2012)
Commonwealth v. Masker
34 A.3d 841 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)
Commonwealth v. Garcia
23 A.3d 1059 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)