Commonwealth v. Abken

391 A.2d 672, 258 Pa. Super. 582, 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4014
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 12, 1978
DocketAppeal, No. 986
StatusPublished

This text of 391 A.2d 672 (Commonwealth v. Abken) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Abken, 391 A.2d 672, 258 Pa. Super. 582, 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4014 (Pa. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

HOFFMAN, J., dissented for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Commonwealth v. Walton, 252 Pa.Super. 54, 380 A.2d 1278 (1977). SPAETH, J., dissented for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Commonwealth v. Walton, 252 Pa.Super. 54, 380 A.2d 1278 (1977), and his concurring opinion in Commonwealth v. Adams, 245 Pa.Super. 431, 369 A.2d 479 (1976). WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Walton
380 A.2d 1278 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)
Commonwealth v. Adams
369 A.2d 479 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
391 A.2d 672, 258 Pa. Super. 582, 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4014, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-abken-pasuperct-1978.