Commonwealth v. Abken

391 A.2d 672, 258 Pa. Super. 582, 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4014
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 12, 1978·No. Appeal, No. 986·Published

Opinion

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

HOFFMAN, J., dissented for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Commonwealth v. Walton, 252 Pa.Super. 54, 380 A.2d 1278 (1977). SPAETH, J., dissented for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Commonwealth v. Walton, 252 Pa.Super. 54, 380 A.2d 1278 (1977), and his concurring opinion in Commonwealth v. Adams, 245 Pa.Super. 431, 369 A.2d 479 (1976). WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Abken, 391 A.2d 672, 258 Pa. Super. 582, 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4014 (Pa. Ct. App. 1978).

391 A.2d 672 (Commonwealth v. Abken) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Walton
380 A.2d 1278 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)
Commonwealth v. Adams
369 A.2d 479 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1976)