Commonwealth v. 605 University Drive
71 A.3d 915
This text of 71 A.3d 915 (Commonwealth v. 605 University Drive) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Commonwealth v. 605 University Drive, 71 A.3d 915 (Pa. 2013).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 16th day of July, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner are:
(1) Whether a plurality of the Commonwealth Court erred in holding that the Controlled Substances Forfeiture Act mandates that a hearing he held before property is forfeited and that forfeiture may never be obtained by summary judgment.
(2) Whether a plurality of the Commonwealth Court erred by finding the Rules of Civil Procedure inapplicable to proceedings under the Controlled Substances Forfeiture Act on the theory that the Forfeiture Act provides the complete procedure” governing forfeiture actions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
71 A.3d 915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-605-university-drive-pa-2013.