Commonwealth Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. Ellis

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. Ellis

43 A. 1101, 192 Pa. 329, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 920

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 19, 1899

DocketAppeal, No. 79

StatusPublished

This text of 43 A. 1101 (Commonwealth Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. Ellis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. Ellis, 43 A. 1101, 192 Pa. 329, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 920 (Pa. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Green,

In the opinion just filed in the case of the appeal of H. Victoria Ellis from the same decree entered in this case, No. 87, January term, 1899, we have set fortli our reasons for sustaining the decree of the court below giving precedence to the mortgage held by the plaintiff in the distribution of the fund in court. It is not necessary to repeat those reasons here. In the same opinion we have held that the present appellant is not entitled to any share of the fund as a mechanic’s lien creditor of the defendant. The numerous assignments of error in the present appeal must necessarily fall upon the ruling that the appellant has no standing as a mechanic’s lien creditor. The assignments of error are all dismissed.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Green,

In the opinion just filed in the case of the appeal of H. Victoria Ellis from the same decree entered in this case, No. 87, January term, 1899, we have set fortli our reasons for sustaining the decree of the court below giving precedence to the mortgage held by the plaintiff in the distribution of the fund in court. It is not necessary to repeat those reasons here. In the same opinion we have held that the present appellant is not entitled to any share of the fund as a mechanic’s lien creditor of the defendant. The numerous assignments of error in the present appeal must necessarily fall upon the ruling that the appellant has no standing as a mechanic’s lien creditor. The assignments of error are all dismissed.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 A. 1101, 192 Pa. 329, 1899 Pa. LEXIS 920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-title-insurance-trust-co-v-ellis-pa-1899.