Commonwealth, Pet v. Popielarcheck, A.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth, Pet v. Popielarcheck, A.

170 A.3d 1018

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 29, 2017·No. Commonwealth, Pet v. Popielarcheck, A. - No. 101 WAL 2017 (Granted)·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of August, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED with.respect to the following issue:

When a sentencing court sentences a DUI offender in need of further treatment to County Intermediate Punishment pursuant to 42 Pa.C,S. § 9763, is the sentencing court required to impose a mandatory maximum sentence pursuant to 76 Pa.C.S. § 3804(d)?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of August, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED with.respect to the following issue:

When a sentencing court sentences a DUI offender in need of further treatment to County Intermediate Punishment pursuant to 42 Pa.C,S. § 9763, is the sentencing court required to impose a mandatory maximum sentence pursuant to 76 Pa.C.S. § 3804(d)?

Commonwealth, Pet v. Popielarcheck, A., 170 A.3d 1018 (Pa. 2017).

Pincite

170 A.3d 1018 (Commonwealth, Pet v. Popielarcheck, A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related