Commonwealth, Pet v. Popielarcheck, A.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth, Pet v. Popielarcheck, A.

170 A.3d 1018

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedAugust 29, 2017

DocketCommonwealth, Pet v. Popielarcheck, A. - No. 101 WAL 2017 (Granted)

StatusPublished

This text of 170 A.3d 1018 (Commonwealth, Pet v. Popielarcheck, A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth, Pet v. Popielarcheck, A., 170 A.3d 1018 (Pa. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of August, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED with.respect to the following issue:

When a sentencing court sentences a DUI offender in need of further treatment to County Intermediate Punishment pursuant to 42 Pa.C,S. § 9763, is the sentencing court required to impose a mandatory maximum sentence pursuant to 76 Pa.C.S. § 3804(d)?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of August, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED with.respect to the following issue:

When a sentencing court sentences a DUI offender in need of further treatment to County Intermediate Punishment pursuant to 42 Pa.C,S. § 9763, is the sentencing court required to impose a mandatory maximum sentence pursuant to 76 Pa.C.S. § 3804(d)?

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

170 A.3d 1018, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-pet-v-popielarcheck-a-pa-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack