Commonwealth., Pet v. Gathright, R.
This text of 121 A.3d 434 (Commonwealth., Pet v. Gathright, R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 14th day of August, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, the order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for consideration by the trial court consistent with Commonwealth v. Carrasquillo, 631 Pa. 692, 115 A.3d 1284, 1292 (2015) (holding “a defendant’s innocence claim must be at least plausible to demonstrate, in and of itself, a fair and just reason *448 for presentenee withdrawal of a plea” and “the proper inquiry on consideration of such a withdrawal motion is whether the accused has made some colorable demonstration, under the circumstances, such that permitting withdrawal of the plea would promote fairness and justice”). Jurisdiction relinquished.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
121 A.3d 434, 632 Pa. 447, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 1764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-pet-v-gathright-r-pa-2015.