Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. Inntermission Lounge & Restaurant, Inc.

542 A.2d 639, 117 Pa. Commw. 26, 1988 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 446
CourtCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJune 9, 1988
DocketAppeal No. 734 C.D. 1987
StatusPublished

This text of 542 A.2d 639 (Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. Inntermission Lounge & Restaurant, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. Inntermission Lounge & Restaurant, Inc., 542 A.2d 639, 117 Pa. Commw. 26, 1988 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 446 (Pa. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

Opinion by

President Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

The Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board (Board) fined Inntermission Lounge and Restaurant, Inc. (Lounge) $350.00 for possessing or operating gambling [27]*27devices or permitting gambling on licensed premises.1 The Allegheny County Common Pleas Court vacated the penalty. The Board appeals; we reverse and remand.

A Pittsburgh City police officer played four video poker machines in the Lounge and was able to “knock down”2 the credits accumulated on each machine (N.T. 2/10/87, p. 5). In a criminal proceeding pursuant to 18 Pa. C. S. §5513 (gambling devices; gambling), the Lounge was found not guilty.

The common pleas court in this administrative proceeding concluded that the criminal decision acted as collateral estoppel against the Board. We disagree.

In V.J.R. Bar Corp. v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, 480 Pa. 322, 390 A.2d 163 (1978), our Supreme Court held that the Board may fine licensees for gambling on premises even though criminal charges based on the same conduct had been dismissed. This Court has consistently followed that precedent. Americus Hose Co., Inc. Liquor License Case, 71 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 218, 454 A.2d 1165 (1983); Mar-Kodis Diner v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, 110 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 507, 532 A.2d 940 (1987).

Thus, we hold that the common pleas court erred in vacating the suspension on the grounds of collateral estoppel. However, since the opinion of the common pleas court fails to contain findings of fact and conclusions of law on the evidence presented, further appellate review is precluded.

The order of the common pleas court is reversed, and this matter is remanded for a decision on the evidence presented at the de novo hearing.

[28]*28Order

The order of the Allegheny County Common Pleas Court, Docket No. S.A. 1095 of 1986 dated March 9, 1987, is reversed. This matter is remanded for findings of fact and conclusions of law.'

Jurisdiction relinquished.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

V. J. R. Bar Corp. v. Commonwealth, Liquor Control Board
390 A.2d 163 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1978)
In re Revocation of Club Liquor License No. C-1827
454 A.2d 1165 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1983)
Mar-Kodis Diner, Inc. v. Commonwealth
532 A.2d 940 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
542 A.2d 639, 117 Pa. Commw. 26, 1988 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-pennsylvania-liquor-control-board-v-inntermission-lounge-pacommwct-1988.