Commonwealth, Office of Attorney General v. Heidelberg Township

934 A.2d 699, 594 Pa. 24, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 2435
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 21, 2007·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 21st day of November, 2007, the orders of the Commonwealth Court in the instant matters are AFFIRMED.

Justice SAYLOR files a dissenting statement in which Justice EAKIN and BAER join.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth, Office of Attorney General v. Heidelberg Township, 934 A.2d 699, 594 Pa. 24, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 2435 (Pa. 2007).

934 A.2d 699 (Commonwealth, Office of Attorney General v. Heidelberg Township) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Com. Office of Atty. Gen. Ex Rel. Corbett v. Locust Tp.
968 A.2d 1263 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2009)
Com. v. HEIDELBERG TP.
934 A.2d 699 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2007)