Commonwealth of Pa. Rel. Hassell v. Hassell

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth of Pa. Rel. Hassell v. Hassell

97 Pa. Super. 112, 1929 Pa. Super. LEXIS 228

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 2, 1929

DocketAppeal 205

StatusPublished

This text of 97 Pa. Super. 112 (Commonwealth of Pa. Rel. Hassell v. Hassell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth of Pa. Rel. Hassell v. Hassell, 97 Pa. Super. 112, 1929 Pa. Super. LEXIS 228 (Pa. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The portion of the record certified and sent up on this appeal is insufficient to enable this court properly to pass on the merits. As the assistant district attorney, who appeared at the bar of the court, stated that if the record were remitted, he would at once cause a petition to be filed on behalf of the relator providing for a hearing de novo on the merits, we have concluded to remit the record so that such petition may be filed.

Record remitted for purpose stated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The portion of the record certified and sent up on this appeal is insufficient to enable this court properly to pass on the merits. As the assistant district attorney, who appeared at the bar of the court, stated that if the record were remitted, he would at once cause a petition to be filed on behalf of the relator providing for a hearing de novo on the merits, we have concluded to remit the record so that such petition may be filed.

Record remitted for purpose stated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

97 Pa. Super. 112, 1929 Pa. Super. LEXIS 228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-of-pa-rel-hassell-v-hassell-pasuperct-1929.